PROPOSALS FOR IRAM TELESCOPES
Winter 2017 Ratings

The IRAM program committee convened in Grenoble on October 17 and 18 to evaluate the proposals submitted for the winter 2017 scheduling period. The discussions were organized in 2 panels which were chaired by Hendrik Linz (MPIA, Heidelberg) and Ric Davies (MPE, Garching). The authors of each proposal will be informed by letter which will include comments issued by the committee if there are any. As usual, the proposals were classified A (accepted), B (backup), and C (rejected).

You have to login to highlight your proposals (PI or Co-I) in the tables below.


NOEMA Interferometer Proposals

A total of 136 proposals were received for the interferometer.

Proposals rated A will be scheduled in priority. Further time, if it becomes available, will go to the B programs, taking into account scientific merit, crowding in certain right ascension ranges and general aspects of balance. For proposals rated A or B which do not have an IRAM internal collaborator, please consult the list of local contacts.

The accepted proposals are listed here.
Grade A:
W17AJ
W17AQ
W17AV
W17BA
W17BB2
W17BC
W17BE
W17BJ
W17BX
W17CB
W17CD
W17CK
W17CM
W17CP
W17CX
W17DD2
W17DG
W17EG
W17EW
W17EX2
W17FB
W17FD
Grade B:
W17AB
W17AC
W17AF
W17AG
W17AI
W17AK
W17AO
W17AW
W17AX
W17AZ
W17BD
W17BF
W17BG
W17BI
W17BM
W17BN
W17BP
W17BQ
W17BS
W17BT
W17BV
W17BW2
W17CC
W17CE
W17CL
W17CR
W17CS
W17CV
W17CW
W17DB
W17DE
W17DH
W17DI
W17DK
W17DL
W17DM
W17DN
W17DQ
W17DT
W17DV
W17EH1
W17EJ
W17EK2
W17EL
W17EM
W17EP
W17EQ
W17ES
W17EV
W17EY2
W17FA3
W17FF
Grade C:
W17AA
W17AE
W17AH
W17AL
W17AM
W17AN
W17AP
W17AR
W17AS
W17AT
W17AU
W17AY
W17BH
W17BK
W17BL
W17BO
W17BR
W17BU
W17BY
W17BZ
W17CA
W17CF
W17CG
W17CH
W17CI
W17CJ
W17CN
W17CO
W17CQ
W17CT
W17CU
W17CY
W17CZ
W17DA
W17DC
W17DF
W17DJ
W17DO
W17DP
W17DR
W17DS
W17DU
W17DW
W17DX
W17DY
W17DZ
W17EA
W17EB
W17EC
W17ED
W17EE
W17EF
W17EI
W17EN
W17EO
W17ER
W17ET
W17EU
W17EZ
W17FC
W17FE
Not rated:
W17AD
1 with time restrictions
2 with downgraded parts
3 time filler

30m telescope Proposals

We received 111 proposals for the 30m telescope. The total requested telescope time amounts to 3489 hours. This includes 11 proposals requesting short-spacing observations in 212 hours. About 47% of the requested time is dedicated to Galactic science.

The highest rating "A" was given to 39 proposals, and 34 proposals were rated "B", i.e. were given backup status. The remaining proposals, although scientifically valuable in most cases, were rated "C". The individual ratings are listed in the table below. All A-rated proposals will be scheduled on the telescope, although some with less time than requested. We expect that about half of the B-rated programs will actually be scheduled. The selection will take into account scientific merit, crowding in certain right ascension ranges, and general aspects of balance. Proposals rated "C" will not get telescope time.

The short spacing proposals will be scheduled on the 30m if they get observed with NOEMA.

The accepted proposals are listed here.
Grade A:
087-17
090-17
091-17
092-17
093-17
097-17
101-17
104-17
108-17
109-17
111-17
115-17
123-17
124-17
125-17
129-17
130-17
132-17
136-17
140-17
142-17
145-17
147-17
150-17
155-17
156-17
167-17
170-17
171-17
172-17
176-17
178-17
179-17
180-17
181-17
183-171
184-17
185-17
186-17
Grade B:
088-17
089-17
096-17
098-17
100-17
102-17
105-17
110-17
114-17
116-17
120-17
121-17
122-17
128-17
131-17
133-17
135-171
137-171
139-17
141-171
143-17
144-17
146-17
148-17
149-17
151-171
152-17
157-17
159-17
162-17
163-17
173-171
177-17
103-17
Grade C:
094-17
095-17
099-17
106-17
107-17
112-17
113-17
117-17
118-17
119-17
126-17
127-17
134-17
138-17
153-17
154-17
158-17
160-17
161-17
164-17
165-17
166-17
168-17
169-17
174-17
175-17
182-17
1 with time restrictions
2 with downgraded parts